Category Archives: Education

UCU Strike Brighton University Thursday 23rd and Friday 24th

Members of the UCU at the University of Brighton will walk out on strike on Thursday at 1pm in dispute about compulsory redundancies. They will continue their strike on Friday and then begin a work-to-contract the following Monday. Further strike action is planned for December. The action follows a ballot which returned majorities in favour of action of more than 85%.

If you can head down to any of the Uni sites from 8pm on Friday to show support on the picket lines please do.

Please send messages of support to ucubrighton@gmail.com

Sexism in Schools: It’s just everywhere

Tuesday December 12th
6.15pm – 7.45pm
Houses of Parliament Westminster Committee Room 2 London SW1A  0AA
Register at Eventbrite Sexism in Schools-“It’s just everywhere” -the National Education Union and UK Feminista are proud to launch their timely report on sexism in schools. The research carried out by Warwick University surveyed students and teachers in secondary schools and teachers in the primary sector.
Please join us for the launch to find out what students and teachers told us about their everyday experiences of sexism in schools and to discuss with our MPs how we tackle it together.
“It happens everywhere, school is no exception and it has become the everyday norm, which I find unacceptable.” Female student

Reclaiming Education 2017. A National Education Service – what should it mean? Held on 11 November 2017

The conference was called under the umbrella of Reclaiming Education, an alliance of organisations including the Socialist Education Association, CASE and ALLFIE, the Alliance for Inclusive Education.

The purpose of the meeting was to discuss Labour’s plans for a National Education Service. So the major focus should have been Labour’s 10 point Charter for a NES. Curiously, the Charter was distributed at the Conference but was not directly discussed. This was a missed opportunity.

The Conference heard from a range of speakers discussing interesting aspects of the various phases of an overall education service – early years, higher education, further education and schools. To have such an overarching and broad sweep of education was clearly a good approach.

Speakers from 2 political parties addressed the conference. Jonathan Bartley from the Greens spoke out about inclusive education and in support of the NEU (National Education Union) policy on academisation, privatisation and selection. Scrap SATS, abolish Ofsted, get rid of academies, were his rallying calls. By contrast, Mike Watson, the Labour education spokesperson in the House of Lords, was much more equivocal and was not as explicit on these issues. He came across as weak.

On early years, we were treated to an interesting presentation on early childhood brain development. From this presentation it became clear that the early years education approach should be more play-based and not formal and rigid and test-based as the case is now. Furthermore, to have an early years baseline assessment was also called into question.

On higher education, we heard about the need to avoid the artificial and negative distinction between the ‘elite’ universities and the rest. And that universities shouldn’t be just for young people.

As far as further education was concerned, the speaker made a case for changing the way that students pay fees but did not call for or discuss the abolition of fees. Of course the demand for fees to be abolished has been made by students themselves. In the light of this it was pointed out from the floor that the conference should have invited representation from the National Campaign against Fees and Cuts so that the voice of progressive students could have been aired.

The Conference was addressed by Save Our Schools, a Brighton based parents’ group which operates in a similar way to Rescue Our Schools here in London. Save our Schools has done very useful work with headteachers and the local community on the issue of reversing the cuts to education. Area based parents’ groups like SOS operate on their own but also liaise on an informal level with other groups nationally.

 

Kevin Courtney of the NEU spoke on the issues facing schools. He said that in the last election 750,000 people changed their vote because of their disgust about cuts to schools budgets. There is a massive crisis, he pointed out. The main elements of this crisis are:

  • Funding, of course
  • The massive scandals around academies. Lack of accountability and financial mismanagement come to mind, and
  • Assessment or more accurately, ‘misassessment’ in which official tests focus on the wrong things in the wrong way and even at the wrong stage of a child’s development.

Kevin urged us to be bold as we take forward the campaign on education in our areas.

A number of very interesting documents were distributed at the meeting. All of these deserve to be discussed by serious activists. They are:

  • Labour’s 10 point Charter for a NES. It makes this commitment: “The National Education Service shall provide education that is free at the point of use, available universally and throughout life”.
  • Manifesto by Rescue Our Schools (a parents organisation). “The world’s most successful education systems have no selection and there’s no evidence it [selection] improves standards or life chances.”
  • 10 Goals by Education Forward. The first goal is “schools should be judged on a much broader set of outcomes (eg students’ resourcefulness; their ability to engage with political, economic and ecological issues; their confidence with digital technologies; their enjoyment of reading)…”
  • A position paper by Reclaiming Education – “The focus of education should be collaboration rather than competition”, is one of the many good points it makes.
  • A proposed Inclusive Education statement distributed by Islington Constituency Labour Party. In the present system, “any child or young person who does not reach the arbitrarily determined standards for their age is vulnerable to exclusion”, it states.
  • A proposed resolution for NEU Conference 2018 on Inclusive Education submitted in the name of Hackney NEU/NUT. It urges us to mount a “Campaign to ensure sufficient and mandatory training for all beginner and in-service teachers on how to implement inclusive education of SEND students in their classrooms and schools.”

The conference had many positives. Let’s build on them.

Barnet council discusses ARK Academy

After a consultation that showed 500 objections and just 35 returns in support of Ark academy, the Tories have included ARK as a surprise agenda item before the council. Labour councilors have criticised this descision following such a large response to a consultation.

Activists are being urged to attended Hendon Town Hall for 7pm on Wednesday the 25th.

On Tuesday 24 October, the National Education Union and our partners will hold a major public rally and lobby of Parliament.

neuThe National Education Union is focusing on improving two aspects of education funding – how much money goes into the system and how the money is shared across schools and colleges with different needs.

That’s why on Tuesday 24 October the National Education Union will hold a mass lobby of Parliament to protest against education funding cuts. This lobby has been timed to take place a month before the Chancellor delivers his budget statement. MPs will be asked to put pressure on the Chancellor to find the funding needed to reverse the cuts and invest in our children and young people. 

In terms of how much money goes into the system, we know that, as pupil numbers rise, funding for their education is not rising accordingly. Since 2015, schools in England have had their funding per pupil frozen while inflation and other costs rise, leading to an effective £2.8 billion real-terms cut.

Schools are having to increase class sizes, reduce curriculum choices and make reductions to teaching and support staff posts. Some schools have been forced to seek help from parents to plug the holes in their budgets for books and resources.

ARK PIONEER in Barnet Again

defendeducationARK want the old Barnet football ground at Underhill, Barnet Lane. As Greenbelt, this cannot be developed, if spare school places exist. On Barnet Lane, is Totteridge Academy (TTA) with spare places. TTA has 29 acres of land if school places are needed in the future. Residents are seriously concerned about the narrow, bendy, country roads of Barnet Lane and Mays Lane which become congested as it is. Mays Lane supports a bus route. Two large secondary schools opposite each other is unwelcome.

Why was our Greenbelt for Sale?

  1. Barnet Council sold our Greenbelt land, to Tony Kleanthous, of Barnet Football Club for the price of a basic car. (about 15 years ago)
  2. Government Education Dept. bought it from Tony for £14.2 Million.
  3. Why was public money spent before planning permission was granted and at a time when existing schools are suffering cuts and have had cuts year on year, to their education budgets?
  4. Ark Pioneer promotes “Blended Learning” from the USA which claims to cut costs with fewer teachers. Computer learning, currently augments education but what is proposed is experimental. It is ARK’s own curriculum and software with an increase in unqualified teachers.

 

What Can You Do?

  • Google on Barnet.gov.uk, “Planning application: Underhill Stadium AND Hockey Club”. The reference Number is 17/4840/FUL. You can comment as a resident of this Borough or if you work here.
  • email Conservative councillors/visit their advice drop in surgeries.
  • Save the Date: 18th September 2017: Public Meeting

Contact: Barnet Parents Defending Education at: b.p.d.education@gmail.com

1 2 3